Friday, July 13, 2012

Delayed Grafton Audits Could Delay Next One Says CPA

A Crystal Lake CPA invited to talk to the Grafton Township Board about auditing its 2011/12 books told the group Thursday that ethical issues from conflicts about the two previous audits would probably prevent his conducting one.  "Any auditor would be unable to issue an opinion because of ethical issues," said George Roach who volunteered to mediate between the Board and audit firm Evans, Marshall & Pease to get the earlier ones squared away.  "I don't have a dog in this fight," he said.

It was the only positive note in a Board meeting that started on a sour one and became increasingly discordant.  At initial issue were what trustees said was tardy compensation.  Moore as Township treasurer cuts checks for her own roughly $60,000 per year salary but she also writes the $100 per meeting checks for trustees.

"Have you been paid since April?" demanded Trustee Jerry McMahon at top stentorian form.

"Yes," replied Supervisor Linda Moore.

"You've been getting your checks," McMahon roared.  "Why haven't we been getting ours? Are you doing this to be mean and nasty to us?"

Trustees last year accelerated the schedule for meeting checks from quarterly to monthly but Thursday Moore challenged their right to do so.  In the argument following, both sides claimed authority in judge Michael Caldwell's seven month-old order to sort out the balance of power on the Grafton Board so no conclusion was reached.

Turning to June bills, Trustee Rob LaPorta unfavorably compared Moore to her predecessor who, he said, had given trustees far more information.  "He provided checks and purchase orders," said LaPorta.  "He brought his laptop in."

"Use this," said Moore, triumphantly whipping out a laptop full of records which she handed to LaPorta.

LaPorta began to boot the computer up while Moore and the rest of the Board bickered over computer investigating firm Forensicon's long-delayed bill for finding out where missing Township financial records went.  Moore agreed Judge Caldwell ordered her to pay the bill but said he never specified how much she should pay.

LaPorta abruptly announced he couldn't get into the laptop's billing program.  "This password doesn't work," he said.  Moore took the thing back but eventually said she couldn't make it work, either.  "It's supposed to," she said.  "I don't know"

More comedy ensued later following heated exchanges between and among McMahon and audience members in the public comment session.  Moore peremptorily rapped her gavel and declared a five-minute recess. "We haven't agreed to it," cried LaPorta.  McMahon quickly nominated him as temporary chairman, the Board as rapidly confirmed it, and Moore dashed back to her seat never having managed to get out of the room.

The entire Board seemed amenable to Roach's offer to be an intermediary to get auditor Paul Thermen to discuss the 2009/10 and 10/11 audits.  Thermen signed the former but has told FEN that until he's paid for it he's barred  by his profession's ethical canons from certifying the latter.  The 10-11 audit is long overdue for submission to the Illinois Comptroller.  So was the 9/10 audit until Moore sent it in without approval from the rest of the Board. A Comptroller's spokesman told FEN last month his office is merely a "repository" and wouldn't address the question of an audit's validity if it hasn't been accepted by the group under examination.

In the pic: Grafton Supervisor Linda Moore (left) was unpersuaded Thursday by arguments by Trustee Rob LaPorta (right) that she ought to issue trustees' meeting checks monthly.  

29 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sigh. Wonder how much damage there will be to the township and its finances before this is all over? Why won't someone stop the madness?

Anonymous said...

Of course Moore wastes no time in paying herself. Why should anyone be surprised? If I was cutting my own paychecks, why would I wait?


On a different note, the line about Moore "dashing back to her seat" made me laugh. If it's not about power and money, Moore wouldn't dash about to do anything.


And regarding the auditors, I give them credit for sticking to their professional ethical canons. Obviously, that's not the case with Moore as she submits unapproved audits to the state suppository. Clearly, she's manipulated the situation to not only put the township at risk with unaudited books, but also put auditors in an unappealing position of forced compromising of ethics on her behalf. But she gets her paycheck on time.

Anonymous said...

There are no words anymore for Linda Moore. She really has no idea of how to run a township. Consequently, the township is getting flushed down the preverbial toilet.

How anyone can stand up at a Grafton meeting and back Linda up is beyond me. What are you smoking? And to have a petition signed for senior bingo .. really?

Anonymous said...

I agree, I wonder how anyone in their right mind could back her up.She would have been fired long ago in a corporation. She is what she is and should not have a public position! Rally up and protest!!

Anonymous said...

Anyone in their right mind would back her. She is not so ignorant as too turn her back on the taxpayers as one trustee? does. The sooner the 4 amigos get replaced the sooner Grafton can straighten out.

Anonymous said...

Seriously? You don't see the way that the records are manipulated. Do you know that the township/taxpayers had to spend in excess of $26,000.00 to find out what happened to the computer records and all along Moore had them in her possession? She pays for things from wrong line items. The sooner we get the supervisor replaced the sooner Grafton can straighten out.

Anonymous said...

I will vote for Linda.

Anonymous said...

Yesterday there were three public comments: 2 directed at the Trustees, 1 directed at the Supervisor. The Trustees took the opportunity to respond to the public comments, even if the person asking the original question didn't like or agree with the response. Supervisor Moore said "it is my policy not to respond to public comments".

If you'd rather have Moore representing you than the Trustees, you deserve her. Hopefully the rest of us don't have to deal with her for another 4 years, though. She's truly an incompetent, egotistical, boob (not libel; fact).

Anonymous said...

Fools are fooled repeatably, and those brainwashed by Moore are fools indeed. Beware however since Moore's path is only a couple of inches away from a cliff whose fall will take her and all of those associated with her for a very character developing ride.

Anonymous said...

Gotta love the goofy David Letterman-esque grin on Moore's ad on the FEN? That pic is dartboard material if ever I saw one. The only things she's been fighting is the trustees and transparency!!!

Anonymous said...

Saved millions so that she could have a fund to pay her entourage of lawyers, ended free lunch so that she could put more on her plate, cut staff so that she could outsource the work, and finally saved fuel expense by leaving the seniors waiting for a bus that never came. Yes, I'd say donating to a fund to reelect her would be a worthy cause--NOT!

Anonymous said...

Any thoughts on financial damage inflicted by the Moore Township Borer? This critter seems to have a four year lifespan and leaving quite a bad trail in its wake.

Anonymous said...

She says that she has saved tax dollars? However, she has cost the taxpayers thousands. What about the fact that she took the township records. Does anyone remember that? She sat at meetings and when the trustees decided they needed to hire Forensicon to search the computers she only voted no and then fought paying the bill for almost two years. She admitted in her testimony that she had taken the records to her home. Now does anyone think that she should have to pay back the money it cost to have to do a forensic audit of the computers because she took the records?

Anonymous said...

They all need to go...the bickering and lawsuits are a joke.

Anonymous said...

The law suits are a joke. Just remember who started the lawsuits. Linda Moore in her capacity as the chief financial officer of the township as she puts it started all the lawsuits.

Anonymous said...

There is a collaboration team forming that will be consolidating all of the cancerous events of Moore including township-dixon, landscaping business, her out-of-state relatives, county board etc. Some of her 'friends' are finally seeing the light and will be taking stands against her; although still appearing as her friend until their moment of testimony. Hmm, Linda, can you guess which ones?

Moore will soon face court conclusions against her around the same period of time. It appears that one of these will be criminal and will finally shut her door. She will never know what hit her. Justice will finally prevail.

Anonymous said...

Coming soon to Grafton Township

Knock-knock!

Who's there?

The Attorney General and the State Police.

Now we know the reason why Linda want's a "drive-thru" window and the reason for Linda's locked door policy.

Anonymous said...

FEN has no shame taking money for that ad. You really need money that bad that you would sell an ad full of lies?

She needs the window to hop out of when the police do come a knocking.

Vote her out in Febuary!!!

First Electric Newspaper LLC said...

FEN advertising is available (at surprisingly low rates!) to anyone who'd care to buy it. In the case of political ads, to choose among them would actually compromise at least the appearance, if not the fact, of editorial impartiality.
-------
While I'm at it, where do you folks think the money to run the independent FEN comes from? I asked Santa and the Easter Bunny for it but they weren't forthcoming.--ed.

Anonymous said...

FEN has no reason to be ashamed because FEN is not a biased reporter. As a legitimate online newspaper he should not decline offering advertising space to whomever requests it.

Anyone who is familiar with Linda Moore's underhanded tactics can see that she is using this as an opportunity to sway readers. If she can get folks to think that FEN has somehow betrayed them by allowing her advertisement, than she has succeeded.

Her advertisement has done it's job by bringing attention to herself. Perhaps it won't be quite the attention she was hoping for, however.

Linda, You've done far too much damage to think that anyone is going to believe what you claim. You have already sewn the wind.

Anonymous said...

Linda's ad was pure genius; evil genius . . . still genius. How can I pizz off even more people today? I know! I'll place an ad featuring my mug along with a few fictional bullet points. That'll pizz em off! Maybe I'll get a vote or two from the uninformed! There, two bird's with one stone. I bet she likes killing birds too . . . "the judge instructed me to pay the Forensicon bill, he didn't day HOW MUCH to pay them though! I can string the release of the Forensicon report till after I'm relected! Suckers!

Anonymous said...

However, poor, poor, linda has overlooked one of her 'friends' who has provided data that should be sufficient to place her out of office before the elections.

Linda, which of your friends can you no longer trust?

Anonymous said...

You took the money and printed an ad knowing it was full of lies and there is no way around that fact.

Santa the Easter bunny are fictional characters but the wicked witch is real and taking her money is pretty low.

First Electric Newspaper LLC said...

What I've always found most interesting about the First Amendment is that almost everybody's for it in theory but very few support it in real-world application.--ed.

Anonymous said...

No worries, Mr FEN. My bigger question is did you wait to run her ad after the check cleared? Moore-PAC is in such deep financial debt (that's a reflection of her overall finanicial prowess, IMO), that she'll never see the funds repaid. So if the PAC is broke, just where's this "new money" coming from? Sounds like a good investigative thesis!

Anonymous said...

Where can the public view the financial condition of Linda's PAC? Can someone please post a link. Thx!

Anonymous said...

http://www.elections.il.gov/CampaignDisclosure/CommitteeDetail.aspx?id=21578

The last report was filed on 7/16/12. Many of the reports are click-able. Click on it and scroll down to see that Total Debt and Obligations are more than $12,000. Yes, that's TWELVE THOUSAND in debt. As far as I can tell, nothing had been paid back from her last campaign. Click through all the reports to see this.
Also, If she is getting individual support, isn't that supposed to be reported?

Anonymous said...

In "theory" then you would post an ad for Hilter as long as he paid?

First Electric Newspaper LLC said...

Yep. It's an absolute.--ed.